World Health Report 2000: a step towards evidence-based health policy.

نویسندگان

  • C Murray
  • J Frenk
چکیده

the policy message in the World Health Report 2000 as “healthcare à la Karl Marx”, whereas Vicente Navarro described it as the mouthpiece of “US financial and political circles”. This contrast in opinions illustrates how discussions of health policy or health system reform often become ideological debates that are fuelled by anecdotes or, at best, by non-comparable results from studies in which differing methods were used. The WHO Framework on Health Systems Performance Assessment is an attempt to accelerate the development of an evidence base on the outcomes of health systems, and of the determinants of these outcomes. Without comparable information about the achievements and organisation of different systems, transcendence of purely ideological debates will be difficult. Clinical practice in many countries is being transformed by evidence-based medicine, and a similar transformation in assessment of health system performance is desperately needed. We hope that the World Health Report 2000 is a step in that direction. Navarro seems to have misinterpreted the fundamental principles of the WHO Framework, which are: to clarify the boundaries of health systems; to assess how health and other systems interact to achieve key social goals; to define and measure health, responsiveness, and fairness in financial contribution; and, ultimately, to show the importance of transparency and accountability for the world’s health systems.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Health systems: more evidence, more debate.

The design and performance of health systems are now at the centre of the international health agenda. This month’s special section of the Bulletin and The World Health Report 2000 are both devoted to health systems. The next decade will witness a lively debate on these issues, increasingly fuelled by multicountry evidence and analysis. Historically, the World Health Organization has not been h...

متن کامل

Global trade and health: key linkages and future challenges.

Globalization of trade, marketing and investment has important implications for public health, both negative and positive. This article considers the implications of the single package of World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements for public health research and policy, focusing on three themes: commodities, intellectual property rights, and health services. The main aims of the analysis are as f...

متن کامل

Achieving a “Grand Convergence” in Global Health by 2035: Rwanda Shows the Way; Comment on “Improving the World’s Health Through the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Perspectives From Rwanda”

Global Health 2035, the report of The Lancet Commission on Investing in Health, laid out a bold, highly ambitious framework for making rapid progress in improving global public health outcomes. It showed that with the right health investments, the international community could achieve a “grand convergence” in global health—a reduction in avertable infectious, maternal, and child deaths down to ...

متن کامل

Reflective Practice: How the World Bank Explored Its Own Biases?

While many international organisations have independent evaluations, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Health organization (WHO), uniquely the World Bank in its 2015 World Development Report sought to ascertain the potential biases that influence how its staff interpret evidence and influence policy. Here, we describe the World Bank’s study design, including experiments ...

متن کامل

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Lancet

دوره 357 9269  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001